Chained Future Cold wallet datasheets

Side by side · rev.

Ledger vs Trezor

Pick Trezor if firmware you can read and build yourself and SLIP-39 share backups come first. Pick Ledger if you accept partly closed secure-element code for its chip-centred design, Bluetooth on the Nano X (listed at $99 on 14 October 2026) and optional services such as Ledger Recover.

Side A
Ledger
Side B
Trezor
Models · 3
  • Ledger Nano S Plus
  • Ledger Nano X
  • Ledger Flex
Models · 3
  • Trezor Safe 3
  • Trezor Safe 5
  • Trezor Safe 7
Price span
$69 to $249 checked 14 Oct 2026
Price span
$59 to $249 checked 14 Oct 2026
Rows that differ
12 of 16
Cells not verified
7 of 96
Sheets merged
6
Values checked
Page revised

Ledger

Trezor

Front views at one scale from published sizes, in mm · bar = 10 mm

Price, size and screen, dimensioned

One scale per chart · zero datum on the left · dashed run = listed range

Price at the maker's shopUS dollars, as listed
  • Ledger Nano S Plus: $69src
  • Ledger Nano X: $99src
  • Ledger Flex: $249src
  • Trezor Safe 3: $59src
  • Trezor Safe 5: $129src
  • Trezor Safe 7: $249src
Screen diagonalinches
  • Ledger Nano S Plus: 1.1 insrc
  • Ledger Nano X: 1.1 insrc
  • Ledger Flex: 2.8 insrc
  • Trezor Safe 3: 0.96 insrc
  • Trezor Safe 5: 1.54 insrc
  • Trezor Safe 7: 2.5 insrc
Weightgrams, as published
  • Ledger Nano S Plus: 21 gsrc
  • Ledger Nano X: 34 gsrc
  • Ledger Flex: 58 gsrc
  • Trezor Safe 3: 14 gsrc
  • Trezor Safe 5: 23 gsrc
  • Trezor Safe 7: 45 gsrc
Thicknessmillimetres, as published
  • Ledger Nano S Plus: 8.2 mmsrc
  • Ledger Nano X: 11.7 mmsrc
  • Ledger Flex: 7.7 mmsrc
  • Trezor Safe 3: 7.4 mmsrc
  • Trezor Safe 5: 8 mmsrc
  • Trezor Safe 7: 8.3 mmsrc

Which fits you

2 of 6 answers differ between the devices

Six plain questions, each answered from one line of each spec sheet. The value the answer rests on is printed under it; the merged table below has every value with its source.

Question Ledger Ledger Nano S Plus Ledger Ledger Nano X Ledger Ledger Flex Trezor Trezor Safe 3 Trezor Trezor Safe 5 Trezor Trezor Safe 7
Its own screen Check the amount and address on the wallet itself. Yes Display: Monochrome OLED, 1.1 inches, 128 x 64, non-touch Yes Display: Monochrome OLED, 1.1 inches, 128 x 64, non-touch Yes Display: E Ink touchscreen, 2.8 inches, 480 x 600, 16 grayscale Yes Display: 0.96-inch monochrome OLED, 128 x 64, buttons Yes Display: 1.54-inch color touchscreen, 240 x 240 Yes Display: 2.5-inch color touchscreen, 520 x 380
Bluetooth or NFCΔ answers differ A radio link in the maker's list of connections. No Connectivity: USB-C Yes Connectivity: USB-C, Bluetooth BLE 5.2 Yes Connectivity: USB-C, Bluetooth BLE 5.2, NFC for Recovery Key and Security Key No Connectivity: USB-C No Connectivity: USB-C, microSD Yes Connectivity: USB-C, Bluetooth 5.0+, Qi2 charging
QR or air-gapped signing Can sign with no cable or radio link to the online device. No Connectivity: USB-C No Connectivity: USB-C, Bluetooth BLE 5.2 No Connectivity: USB-C, Bluetooth BLE 5.2, NFC for Recovery Key and Security Key No Connectivity: USB-C No Connectivity: USB-C, microSD No Connectivity: USB-C, Bluetooth 5.0+, Qi2 charging
Open-source firmwareΔ answers differ The code it runs is published for anyone to read. Partly Open-source firmware: Partial Partly Open-source firmware: Partial Partly Open-source firmware: Partial Yes Open-source firmware: Yes Yes Open-source firmware: Yes Yes Open-source firmware: Yes
Backup in shares Split the backup into shares; a set number of them restores the wallet. Not verified Not verified Not verified Yes Shamir / SLIP-39 backup: SLIP39 Multi-share Backup supported; firmware requirement applies Yes Shamir / SLIP-39 backup: SLIP39 Multi-share Backup supported; firmware requirement applies Yes Shamir / SLIP-39 backup: SLIP39 Multi-share Backup supported; firmware requirement applies
Built-in battery A battery inside, to charge or replace. No Battery: No battery Yes Battery: Up to 5 hours normal use Yes Battery: Up to 10 hours normal use or 150 transactions No Battery: None; USB-powered. Not listed Battery: Powered over USB-C; Trezor's pages we checked do not list a battery. Yes Battery: LiFePO4, 3.2 V, 330 mAh
  • Yes
  • Partly or qualified
  • No
  • Unknown or unclear
  • Answers differ

Devices on this sheet that answer yes

Its own screen
Ledger Nano S Plus, Ledger Nano X, Ledger Flex, Trezor Safe 3, Trezor Safe 5, Trezor Safe 7
Bluetooth or NFC
Ledger Nano X, Ledger Flex, Trezor Safe 7
QR or air-gapped signing
No device on this sheet
Open-source firmware
Trezor Safe 3, Trezor Safe 5, Trezor Safe 7
Backup in shares
Trezor Safe 3, Trezor Safe 5, Trezor Safe 7
Built-in battery
Ledger Nano X, Ledger Flex, Trezor Safe 7

Each side at a glance

not on the other side

Side A · Ledger

  • Ledger Nano S Plus

    From its datasheet Suits people who sign at a computer or Android phone over a cable and want Ledger Wallet's coin range without a battery or a Bluetooth radio.

    No listed features from our chip set

    Distinctive
    USB-connected, battery-free signer for desktop and Android.src
    Recovery on other wallets
    Accounts can be recovered on other hardware or software wallets that support the same standards (BIP32/BIP39/BIP44). Asset and derivation-path compatibility still matters.src
  • Ledger Nano X

    From its datasheet Suits people who want a Nano-sized signer they can use from a phone over Bluetooth or a computer over USB-C, and who accept a battery and a radio link.

    • Bluetooth
    • Battery
    Distinctive
    Nano-format signer with Bluetooth connectivity and an OLED display.src
    Recovery on other wallets
    Accounts can be recovered on other hardware or software wallets that support the same standards (BIP32/BIP39/BIP44). Asset and derivation-path compatibility still matters.src
  • Ledger Flex

    From its datasheet Suits someone who wants a mid-priced touchscreen Ledger with Bluetooth and an NFC backup card, and who accepts that part of the firmware is closed.

    • Bluetooth
    • NFC (not listed on the Trezor side)
    • Battery
    • Touchscreen
    Distinctive
    E Ink touchscreen signer with Bluetooth and NFC.src
    Recovery on other wallets
    Accounts can be recovered on other hardware or software wallets that support the same standards (BIP32/BIP39/BIP44). Asset and derivation-path compatibility still matters.src

Side B · Trezor

  • Trezor Safe 3

    From its datasheet Suits people who want Trezor's open-source firmware, a certified secure element and a choice of BIP39 or SLIP39 backups at the lowest list price in the Safe range, and who can work with a small two-button screen.

    • Open-source firmware (not listed on the Ledger side)
    • Bitcoin-only edition (not listed on the Ledger side)
    Distinctive
    Two-button, monochrome-screen wallet with a dedicated Secure Element.src
    Recovery on other wallets
    BIP39 backups are portable to compatible wallets. Default 20-word SLIP39 backups require SLIP39-compatible recovery.src
  • Trezor Safe 5

    From its datasheet Suits people who want a color touchscreen with haptic confirmation on a Trezor that connects by USB-C cable, and who do not need Bluetooth or wireless charging.

    • Open-source firmware (not listed on the Ledger side)
    • Bitcoin-only edition (not listed on the Ledger side)
    • Touchscreen
    Distinctive
    Color touchscreen with haptic confirmation feedback.src
    Recovery on other wallets
    Supports BIP39 and SLIP39. BIP39 restores on compatible wallets; SLIP39 needs compatible recovery software or hardware.src
  • Trezor Safe 7

    From its datasheet Suits people who want a Trezor that works without a cable, with a battery, Bluetooth and two secure elements, and who accept the highest list price in the Safe range.

    • Open-source firmware (not listed on the Ledger side)
    • Bitcoin-only edition (not listed on the Ledger side)
    • Bluetooth
    • Battery
    • Touchscreen
    Distinctive
    Wireless touchscreen wallet combining TROPIC01 and OPTIGA Secure Elements with a separate MCU.src
    Recovery on other wallets
    Supports BIP39 and SLIP39; default 20-word backup is SLIP39, not a BIP39 mnemonic.src

Chips are shown only where the device's spec record supports them: open-source firmware, a Bitcoin-only edition, QR or air-gapped signing, Bluetooth, NFC, a built-in battery and a touchscreen. A missing chip means the record does not list the feature or we could not verify it.

The spec sheets, merged

Marked rows differ. A dot means not verified.

Specification LedgerLedger Nano S PlusLedgerLedger Nano XLedgerLedger FlexTrezorTrezor Safe 3TrezorTrezor Safe 5TrezorTrezor Safe 7
Δ differs:Price at maker $69src $99src $249src $59src $129src $249src
Δ differs:Released 2022src 2019src 2024src 2023src 2024src 2025src
Δ differs:Display Monochrome OLED, 1.1 inches, 128 x 64, non-touchsrc Monochrome OLED, 1.1 inches, 128 x 64, non-touchsrc E Ink touchscreen, 2.8 inches, 480 x 600, 16 grayscalesrc 0.96-inch monochrome OLED, 128 x 64, buttonssrc 1.54-inch color touchscreen, 240 x 240src 2.5-inch color touchscreen, 520 x 380src
Δ differs:Connectivity USB-Csrc USB-C, Bluetooth BLE 5.2src USB-C, Bluetooth BLE 5.2, NFC for Recovery Key and Security Keysrc USB-Csrc USB-C, microSDsrc USB-C, Bluetooth 5.0+, Qi2 chargingsrc
Δ differs:Secure element ST33K1M5src ST33J2M0src ST33K1M5src Infineon OPTIGA Trust M (V3), certified to Common Criteria EAL6+.srcsrc 2 Infineon OPTIGA Trust M (V3), certified to Common Criteria EAL6+.srcsrc 2 Two secure elements: Tropic Square TROPIC01 and Infineon OPTIGA Trust M (V3). OPTIGA Trust M is EAL6+ certified.srcsrc 2
Δ differs:Open-source firmware Partialsrc Partialsrc Partialsrc Yessrc Yessrc Yessrc
Δ differs:Coins supported 500+ through Ledger Wallet; thousands through third-party walletssrc 500+ through Ledger Wallet; thousands through third-party walletssrc 500+ through Ledger Wallet; thousands through third-party walletssrc Thousands of coins and tokenssrc Thousands of coins and tokenssrc Thousands of coins and tokens; examples include BTC, ETH, SOL, Arbitrum and USDC.src
Bitcoin-only edition Not verified Not verified Not verified Yessrc Yessrc Yessrc
Passphrase Yessrc Yessrc Yessrc Yessrc Yessrc Yessrc
Δ differs:Multisig Yessrc Yessrc Yessrc Through compatible third-party software; not directly in Trezor Suitesrc Through compatible third-party software; not directly in Trezor Suitesrc Through compatible third-party software; not directly in Trezor Suitesrc
Shamir / SLIP-39 backup Not verified Not verified Not verified SLIP39 Multi-share Backup supported; firmware requirement appliessrc SLIP39 Multi-share Backup supported; firmware requirement appliessrc SLIP39 Multi-share Backup supported; firmware requirement appliessrc
Δ differs:Backup format 24-word recovery phrase; optional services/cards vary by modelsrc 24-word recovery phrase; optional services/cards vary by modelsrc 24-word recovery phrase; optional services/cards vary by modelsrc BIP39 12/24 words or SLIP39 20-word sharessrc BIP39 12/24 words or SLIP39 20-word sharessrc BIP39 12/24 words or SLIP39 20-word sharessrc
Δ differs:Companion app Ledger Walletsrc Ledger Walletsrc Ledger Walletsrc Trezor Suitesrc Trezor Suitesrc Trezor Suitesrc
Δ differs:Battery No batterysrc Up to 5 hours normal usesrc Up to 10 hours normal use or 150 transactionssrc None; USB-powered.src Powered over USB-C; Trezor's pages we checked do not list a battery.src LiFePO4, 3.2 V, 330 mAhsrc
Δ differs:Size and weight 62.4 x 17.4 x 8.2 mm; 21 gsrc 72 x 18.6 x 11.7 mm; 34 gsrc 78.4 x 56.5 x 7.7 mm; 58 gsrc 59 x 32 x 7.4 mm; 14 gsrc 65.9 x 40 x 8 mm; 23 gsrc 75.4 x 44.5 x 8.3 mm; 45 gsrc
Made by (country) France (company address)src France (company address)src France (company address)src Czech Republicsrc Czech Republicsrc Not verified

Values from each maker's documentation, checked 14 Oct 2026. Each src link opens the page the value came from. 7 of 96 cells are not verified.

The main difference is where you place trust. Ledger keeps keys in a secure element whose low-level code is closed under the chip maker’s agreement. Trezor publishes its firmware as open source and pairs it with secure element chips. We rank neither without a stated criterion. Everything here comes from the makers’ documentation, published research and the incident sources recorded in our dataset, not hands-on use.

Ledger or Trezor: which wallet should you pick?

  • Auditable firmware first: Trezor.
  • Split backups on a published standard: Trezor, through SLIP-39 Multi-share Backup.
  • A paid recovery service or a backup smart card: Ledger, with Ledger Recover and the Ledger Recovery Key.
  • Bluetooth at a lower listed price: Ledger. On 14 October 2026 the Nano X, with Bluetooth, was listed at $99 and Trezor’s Bluetooth model, the Safe 7, at $249.
  • A Bitcoin-only edition: Trezor offers one for the Safe 3, Safe 5 and Safe 7. Ledger’s pages we checked do not describe one.

How do Ledger and Trezor protect your keys?

Ledger lists an ST33K1M5 secure element in the Nano S Plus and Flex, and an ST33J2M0 in the Nano X. Ledger explains that its agreement with the chip maker legally prevents it from publishing the low-level code that talks to the secure element, and describes its operating system and software as 95% open source and/or available for review.

Trezor says its software has always been open source and that anyone can verify and build it. Trezor’s secure element page names the chip in the Safe 3 and Safe 5 as the OPTIGA Trust M (V3), certified to Common Criteria EAL6+; the Safe 7 pairs the same chip with TROPIC01, which Trezor describes as independently auditable.

In practice the difference is how much device code you can inspect: Trezor publishes its firmware for anyone to verify and build, while Ledger withholds the low-level secure element code. Our guide Is Ledger safe? goes further.

What is Ledger Recover, and what does Trezor offer instead?

Ledger describes Recover as a paid, optional subscription: an encrypted backup of the recovery phrase is split into three fragments held by Coincover, Ledger and EscrowTech, and restoring needs two of them after an ID and selfie check through Onfido. After customer criticism of its May 2023 announcement, Ledger delayed the service and sped up open-sourcing work. Ledger also sells the Recovery Key, a PIN-protected card for its NFC touchscreen devices such as the Flex.

Trezor’s documented answer to losing a single backup is one you hold yourself: Multi-share Backup, which splits the backup into up to 16 shares and a threshold you choose.

How do Ledger and Trezor backups differ?

Ledger devices use a 24-word BIP-39 phrase, and Ledger says all its devices support a passphrase. We found no SLIP-39 support on Ledger’s pages.

Trezor’s backup guide says the Safe 7, Safe 5 and Safe 3 (from June 2024) default to a 20-word SLIP-39 backup, with 12 or 24-word BIP-39 available at setup in Trezor Suite. The SLIP-39 specification states that the two formats are not compatible. For a Safe 3, Safe 5 or Safe 7 on its default SLIP-39 backup, we found no documented way to restore on a Ledger, while a BIP-39 phrase can move between them if the other wallet supports the same assets and derivation paths. See our seed phrase guide.

What security incidents have Ledger and Trezor had?

Ledger, from our records for the three models above:

  • June 2020, disclosed in July: unauthorised access to Ledger’s e-commerce and marketing database exposed customer emails and, for a subset, contact and order details. Ledger says it fixed the breach after a researcher’s report; in December 2020 it reported a larger dump of customer records published online.
  • December 2023: malicious releases of the Ledger Connect Kit software library reached third-party apps that used it. Ledger deployed a genuine replacement; this was not an attack on the devices.
  • January 2025: a missing check in the Nano X and Flex microcontroller update could brick a device; fixed in Nano X 2.4.2 and Flex 1.2.2, and Ledger says funds were not at risk.
  • January 2026: Ledger customers’ order and contact data were exposed through a third party, Global-e. Customers were notified and warned about phishing.

The Nano X datasheet adds older items from 2020 and 2021, including a supply-chain demonstration by Kraken.

Trezor:

  • January 2024: unauthorised access to Trezor’s support portal was used to send seed-phishing messages. Trezor restricted access and warned affected users.
  • November 2024: Ledger’s Donjon team bypassed some supply-chain countermeasures on the original Safe 3, which was not described as extraction from a set-up, locked wallet. Later Safe 3 units use an upgraded microcontroller; the Safe 5 was not affected.
  • June 2025: attackers abused Trezor’s support form to send phishing replies. Trezor said the issue was contained and the phishing site removed.

None of these entries describes keys being extracted from a set-up, locked device. The datasheets list each event with its source.

How much do Ledger and Trezor wallets cost?

Prices on each maker’s own shop, in US dollars, on 14 October 2026:

  • Ledger: Nano S Plus $69, Nano X $99, Flex $249. Outside this comparison, the Nano Gen5 was $179 and the Stax $399, so the current Ledger range in our records ran from $69 to $399.
  • Trezor: Safe 3 $59, Safe 5 $129, Safe 7 $249, a range of $59 to $249.

Ledger Recover costs extra: Ledger’s Recover article listed it at $9.99 a month when checked on 14 October 2026.

Ledger Nano vs Trezor: how do the models line up?

Prices as listed on 14 October 2026.

  • Entry: Nano S Plus ($69) and Safe 3 ($59). Both are USB-C, battery-free devices with small monochrome screens and no touchscreen.
  • Middle: Nano X ($99) adds Bluetooth and a battery; Safe 5 ($129) adds a colour touchscreen but stays wired over USB-C.
  • Touchscreen: Flex and Safe 7, both $249. Flex: 2.8-inch E Ink, Bluetooth and NFC. Safe 7: 2.5-inch colour, Bluetooth and Qi2 charging.

Within each brand: Nano X vs Nano S Plus, Trezor Safe 3 vs Safe 5, Ledger Flex vs Stax.

What we could not verify

  • Where Ledger devices are manufactured: Ledger’s pages give a Paris company address, not a factory location. The Safe 7’s manufacturing country is also not stated.

Security events on record

30 entries across 6 devices

Every documented event our dataset lists for each model, placed by date. The count includes maker-level events that predate a model, as the scope line says. An empty row means we found no documented event, not that none exists.

  • Ledger Nano S Plus 5 events

    5 events, 25 Jun 2020 to 5 Jan 2026
    1. Global-e customer-order data, brand-level context. Ledger customer contact and order information was exposed through Global-e. Customers were notified and warned about phishing. src
    2. Ledger Connect Kit and integrating third-party DApps. A compromised npm account distributed malicious Connect Kit releases. Ledger deployed a genuine replacement. This was not a hardware seed-extraction incident. src
    3. Ledger Recover controversy, brand-level context. Following customer criticism, Ledger announced accelerated open sourcing and delayed Recover pending that work. The service was described as optional. src
    4. brand. Ledger disclosed an e-commerce and marketing customer-data breach. This is a brand-level privacy incident. src
    5. Ledger customer database, brand-level context. Customer contact and order data were accessed. Ledger patched the breach; the larger leaked dataset became public in December 2020. src
  • Ledger Nano X 8 events

    8 events, 25 Jun 2020 to 5 Jan 2026
    1. Global-e customer-order data. Ledger customer contact and order information was exposed through Global-e. Customers were notified and warned about phishing. src
    2. Nano X MCU firmware-update validation. Missing reset-handler validation could permanently brick a device. Fixed in Nano X 2.4.2 or later; Ledger reports funds were not at risk. src
    3. Ledger Connect Kit and third-party DApps. Malicious npm releases were replaced with a genuine Connect Kit release. This was not hardware seed extraction. src
    4. Ledger Recover controversy. Ledger announced accelerated open sourcing and delayed Recover pending that work; participation was described as optional. src
    5. Physical phishing packages impersonating Ledger. Kraken examined modified Nano X packages sent as supposed replacements. Its report explicitly distinguished the scam from a Ledger firmware flaw. src
    6. Nano secure-channel protocol. Ledger disclosed a length-extension attack with limited impact. Nano X firmware 1.3.0 contained a fix. src
    7. Nano X before delivery or initial setup. Kraken demonstrated supply-chain attacks involving the non-secure processor and host-computer compromise. The article describes initial app installation disabling debugging. src
    8. Ledger customer database. Customer contact and order data were accessed. Ledger patched the breach; a larger dataset was published in December. src
  • Ledger Flex 6 events

    6 events, 25 Jun 2020 to 5 Jan 2026
    1. Global-e customer-order data. Ledger customer contact and order information was exposed through Global-e. Customers were notified and warned about phishing. src
    2. Flex MCU firmware-update validation. Missing reset-handler validation could brick the device. Fixed in Flex 1.2.2 or later; Ledger reports funds were not at risk. src
    3. Historical Ledger Connect Kit incident, predating Flex. Malicious npm releases were replaced with a genuine release. Included as software-supply-chain history. src
    4. Historical Ledger Recover controversy, predating Flex. Ledger announced accelerated open sourcing and delayed Recover pending that work; the service was described as optional. src
    5. brand. Ledger disclosed an e-commerce and marketing customer-data breach. This is a brand-level privacy incident. src
    6. Historical Ledger customer-data incident, predating Flex. Ledger patched unauthorized customer-database access. Included as brand history, not a Flex hardware compromise. src
  • Trezor Safe 3 3 events

    3 events, 17 Jan 2024 to 23 Jun 2025
    1. Trezor support-form impersonation campaign. Attackers abused support replies for phishing. Trezor said the issue was contained and the phishing site removed. src
    2. Original Safe 3 supply-chain countermeasures. Ledger Donjon demonstrated a bypass of some supply-chain countermeasures. This was not described as extraction from an initialized, locked wallet. Later Safe 3 hardware uses an upgraded MCU. src
    3. Trezor support portal, brand-level. Unauthorized portal access enabled seed-phishing messages. Trezor restricted access and warned affected users. src
  • Trezor Safe 5 3 events

    3 events, 17 Jan 2024 to 23 Jun 2025
    1. Trezor support-form impersonation. Attackers abused support replies for phishing. Trezor said the issue was contained and the phishing site removed. src
    2. Safe 3 research, explicit Safe 5 exclusion. Trezor states Safe 5 was not affected by the reported Safe 3 supply-chain bypass because it uses a newer MCU. src
    3. Historical Trezor support-portal incident. Unauthorized portal access enabled seed phishing. Trezor restricted access and warned affected users. This predates Safe 5. src
  • Trezor Safe 7 5 events

    5 events, 17 Jan 2024 to 16 Aug 2026
    1. Safe 7 secure element authenticity checks, date reported. Trezor's security portal says Safe 7 authenticity proofs were verified against a combined key set rather than per secure element, so one valid proof could satisfy all three checks. Trezor says each proof is now bound to its own element. src
    2. Safe 7 host pairing (Trezor Host Protocol), date reported. Trezor's security portal says a host could complete Safe 7 pairing without the code shown on the device by supplying a degenerate value in the pairing key exchange. Trezor says such values are now rejected. src
    3. TROPIC01 secure element in the Safe 7, physical lab attack. Ledger Donjon published a laser fault-injection attack on an opened TROPIC01 chip that bypassed its firmware check and could extract a secret tied to its PIN functions. Trezor says it needs physical possession and lab equipment, that TROPIC01 alone does not give access to the PIN or funds, and that users need not act; a full firmware fix cannot be applied remotely. src
    4. Historical Trezor support-form impersonation. Attackers abused support replies for phishing. Trezor said the issue was contained and the phishing site removed. src
    5. Historical Trezor support-portal incident, not Safe 7 hardware. Unauthorized portal access enabled seed phishing. Trezor restricted access and warned affected users. src

Parts list and further sheets

6 devices · 7 related comparisons

Item and model Side Status Released Events Sources Datasheet Also compared in
Ledger Nano S PlusLedger Ledger In production 2022 5 12 Datasheet: Ledger Nano S Plus
Ledger Nano XLedger Ledger In production 2019 8 16 Datasheet: Ledger Nano X
Ledger FlexLedger Ledger In production 2024 6 12 Datasheet: Ledger Flex
Trezor Safe 3Trezor Trezor In production 2023 3 14 Datasheet: Trezor Safe 3
Trezor Safe 5Trezor Trezor In production 2024 3 14 Datasheet: Trezor Safe 5
Trezor Safe 7Trezor Trezor In production 2025 5 15 Datasheet: Trezor Safe 7

Comparisons sharing a device with this one